Case 13 cont'd
Image findings: - Acquisition of images occurred for 2 hours, at 30 mins intervals. The images show tracer activity at 1 and 2 hours which were quantified at 88.2% and 67.3%, respectively. The half emptying time (T1/2) was 163.3 minutes. Gastric emptying time was markedly delayed compared to normal values.


A. Hypothyroidism is a possible cause of delayed gastric emptying, but not the most common cause.
B. Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of chronic gastroparesis (diabetic gastroparesis).
C. Pernicious anemia is a possible cause of delayed gastric emptying, but not the most common cause.
D. Duodenal ulcers are a cause of rapid gastric emptying, not delayed emptying
Q1. Answer: B.
A. Thyroxine can be a cause of rapid gastric emptying
B. Gastrin dysfunction may be a cause of gastric stasis and delayed emptying
C. Estrogen dysfunction may be a cause of gastric stasis and delayed emptying
D. Glucagon dysfunction may be a cause of gastric stasis and delayed emptying
Q2. Answer: A.
A. Incomplete meal ingestion can falsely appear as rapid emptying.
B. Prolonged time to ingest the meal may cause a delay in acquiring the initial image that is used to calculate the percentage of retention. Patients are typically instructed to finish their meal in 10 minutes.
C. Vomiting a portion of the meal after the initial image has already been acquired may give an abnormal result and erroneously demonstrate rapid emptying as less of the meal is retained.
D. Strong radiotracer binding to the ingested meal is essential to get accurate results. A common meal used in solid gastric emptying studies is fried eggs labeled with Tc-99m, which binds very well to the albumin contained in the eggs.
E. Answers A to D are all correct.
F. False
Q3. Answer: E.
Discussion:
There is no standard protocol for conducting gastric emptying studies, as methods vary depending on the laboratory performing the test. However, some core principles remain the same. A radiolabeled meal is ingested and the gastric emptying study is acquired on computer for 90 – 120 minutes. The study may be performed with liquid or solid meals. Solid meals are more sensitive than liquid meals for detection of abnormalities. Liquid studies are always normal when solid studies are normal, however when solid studies are normal, liquid studies may appear as either normal or abnormal. Solid emptying studies demonstrate a lag phase, after which emptying occurs at a constant linear rate. Liquid studies do not have a lag phase, are mono exponential and have a normal half-time of 10-20 minutes (see Figure 1 for comparison). The gastric emptying study may be conducted with either single or dual isotope. Dual isotope studies allow the simultaneous acquisition of liquid and solid meal studies by labelling both meals with different isotopes. This method is not preferred due to the higher coast and ionizing radiation exposure and has no added benefit than a single-isotope solid gastric emptying study.
As the ingested meal moves posteriorly to anteriorly in the stomach (from the fundus to the antrum, which are anatomically positioned as such), there needs to be attenuation correction. As the antrum is positioned more anteriorly with respect to the fundus, it is closer to the camera and, as food travels down, it becomes detected in larger amounts even though the quantity may not have changed. The gold standard for correcting the attenuation artifact is the geometric mean method, which involves taking opposite images (anterior and posterior projections) and calculating the geometric mean of the radioactive counts at each data point (see Figure 2). A study demonstrating delayed gastric emptying, as per Georgetown University Hospital protocol, is quantified as less than 30% emptying at 90 minutes (solid study).

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10620-013-2715-9
Figure 1 - Patterns of gastric emptying of liquids and solids in health and in gastroparesis

Figure 2 – Importance of attenuation correction
Although criteria and threshold values may vary between labs, there are a few “gold rules” to keep in mind. One of the best discriminators between a normal and abnormal study has been found to be the presence of greater than 10% of the meal remaining at 4 hours. A study may also be considered delayed if there is more than 60% of the solid meal remaining at 2 hours.
Studies have been conducted to determine thresholds for normal values. The findings of one such study are indicated in the table below:

Consensus guidelines have been published in 2008 in a joint report by the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. This report may be found here: